Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0895820220320030085
Journal of Oriental Rehabilitation Medicine
2022 Volume.32 No. 3 p.85 ~ p.107
Reporting Qualitative Research of Systematic Review in the Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation According to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 Guidelines
Na Hyeon-Uk

Park Shin-Hyeok
Woo Hyeon-Jun
Han Yun-Hee
Geum Ji-Hye
Lee Jung-Han
Ha Won-Bae
Abstract
Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess the reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation (JKMR) using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines.

Methods Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in JKMR, published from January 1991 to January 2022, were selected by searching the Korean studies Information Service System and JKMR homepage. Two independent researchers searched and selected systematic reviews and meta-analyses and evaluated the reporting quality of abstracts and main texts using the PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

Results Of 1,515 articles, 39 systematic reviews were finally included for assessment.
Evaluation of abstracts resulted in 2 studies rated as high, 11 studies rated as moderate, and 26 studies rated as low. A maximum of 83.3% and a minimum of 25.0% of the items were reported in the abstracts. Evaluation of the manuscripts resulted in no studies rated as high, 14 studies rated as moderate, and 25 studies rated as low. A maximum of 67.9% and a minimum of 34.1% of the items were reported in the manuscripts.

Conclusions To improve the quality of systematic reviews published in JKMR, it is necessary to conduct systematic reviews based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
KEYWORD
PRISMA 2020, Qualitative research, Systematic review, Meta-analysis, Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)